Do you realise I’m a different person to the other poster? You told them to read the website and you are telling me not to read the website.
I already clicked through to the source, an RT article, which is clearly labelled as posted by the Russian part of BRICS.
I also looked up the MP, who was expelled from her liberal party for corrupt activities and now represents the party of an oligarch which has less than 1% of the national vote share.
So yes in conclusion, it is Russian propaganda. Who knows if the 100,000 figure is true, she is the only source, but without context it doesn’t really mean anything anyway.
Was I supposed to read all that or not?
Are you seriously just bad at reading btw? I was extremely clear I am making fun of you for reading random widgets on the site instead of ONE PAGE. Every news article you complain about is like one page of information and you have to be dragged kicking and screaming 😭🤧
TIL its tOtALlY rANdOm to read the “About Us” page of a website that people are discussing the origin of.
You found another reason to avoid thinking about the article’s contents after finally managing to read it. You think the Ukrainian parliament member made it up - why? To become more unpopular? Just to fuck with you? Where are you going with it?
No, the content of the article has no merit because of the source. Nothing is verifiable and the source has strong Russian ties. Russia, who is known for spreading false information, called “propaganda”. I would suggest looking that word up, because you don’t seem to know what it is or how it works.
They really aren’t giving you click farm employees much training are they? You sound like a moron reciting the online distruption rulebook directly. Try harder next time.
No, the content of the article has no merit because of the source.
- El Pais: Alarm in Ukraine over increasing number of army deserters
- Al Jazeera: Why is Ukraine’s army facing a desertion crisis?
.
Russia, who is known for spreading false information, called “propaganda”.
You seem to be completely ignoring my analysis of the content and the source and the MPs background which I posted above. It seems like I’ve thought about it more than you.
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/08/europe/ukraine-military-morale-desertion-intl-cmd/index.html
Look! CNN is spreading Russian propaganda! Everyone but you and Zelensky are Russians! Oh no!
19,000 official prosecutions for desertion alone, those are the ones they could bring charges against. And this is the # they are willing to admit in the same outlet that told us Russia was running out of missiles.
Your analysis is calling everyone who acknowledges what soldiers are themselves admitting on their social media accounts Russian propagandists, the joke writes itself. I am sure you approve of Zelensky purging everyone in the government who doesn’t worship Stepan Bandera fervently enough.
Sorry, next time I will look at all Ukrainian soldier social media accounts and then look up who Stepan Bandera is and worship him and I’m sure that will provide more context to the article you posted
https://www.politico.eu/article/zelenskyy-dismisses-controversial-ambassador-to-germany/
You’ve had enough years now to familiarize yourself with the absolute basics of politics and history in Ukraine, it’s only been the cause of multiple international incidents such as with Poland. You know, because the current government in Ukraine since 2014 worships a movement that preemptively massacred Poles and Jews as the Nazis were coming?
In my first reply I already told you it was Russian propaganda, in addition to 4 other countries’. Nobody told you not to read the website, I told you to respond to the content of the actual article if you want to pretend to actually reply, not dick around exploring every link you find.
She is the ONLY SOURCE? Do you think that a member of Ukrainian parliament is going to get away with lying about what the military is saying? The lack of context exists only because of your lack of investigation into the subject.
Thanks for the additional context.
The additional context: “yes, I posted a propaganda article, but your investigation of the source and the source of the source wasn’t enough. You need to investigate more but I won’t provide any links or other sources.”
I ONLY POST PROPAGANDA ARTICLES! News IS propaganda! 📢📢📢
You’re literally demanding spoon feeding 😭 go copy and paste the name of the member of parliament and key words from the statement into your desired search engine you intransigent fraudster
That would be the “Source of the source”
What are you going to do when you find out it’s real and quite obvious at that?
