luckily this is just a 32; i had a 70 from the same brand with the same INSANELY FUCKING STUPID STAND DESIGN that i had to find something for…literally at the most extreme edges of the thing, what the fuck is this? this is so fucking stupid, it cannot be meaningfully cheaper than a proper design and it looks fucking dumb as hell and surely this has pissed off 90% of people that wanted a TV and want to put it on a little stand like a normal fucking person right??
Putting a giant TV on a tiny stand is not normal… Be mildly infuriated at yourself, not the manufacturer
That stand doesn’t seem tiny to me
That’s just an end table by the looks of it. OP said it’s only a 32 inch TV. Hell they even provided a cat for scale.
It’s too small for that tv
Yep, the included feet are just something you might be able to use until you get a real mount.
If you really want the TV to stand on furniture, buy a proper vesa mounted stand (they can be very cheap) and maybe even a proper TV table.
Get a board and put it beneath the thing?
So many people attacking OP and perhaps not remembering there was a time when nearly all flat panel TVs came on a pedestal mount. The designs were largely changed to mitigate claims and liability.
One large source of liability also sitting on the desk in that picture, in fact.
Pedestal mounts suck. Too wobbly.
On the other hand, if you buy something, check what you’re buying. Don’t complain if you don’t even know what you’re buying.
Maybe the higher end TVs publish the feet width on the box, but the one I got a few years ago sure didn’t. It was actually really frustrating to find that info for any of the TVs I was looking at at the time.
Even looking at a modern budget TV from Amazon, it doesn’t say anything about the width of the legs on the product page. https://www.amazon.com/amazon-fire-tv-50-inch-4-series-4k-smart-tv/dp/B0B3GTSQ9Q/
I found what I believe to be a very similar (if not the same) TV that OP has, and it also doesn’t have the specs listed on the Bestbuy website. https://www.bestbuy.com/site/tcl-43-class-s4-s-class-4k-uhd-hdr-led-smart-tv-with-google-tv/6538141.p?skuId=6538141
Did it have a picture on the box?
There are many thoughtless, idiotic design choices today, for example curved edge phone screens, shitty ultrasonic/photo fingerprint sensors in the scren, no jack connector, microsim, etc. I call it engineer idiotism.
That and the endless pressure to innovate means they end up suggesting stupid shit no one wants and have the sales folks work that out
deleted by creator
oh sure start giving them ideas about usb-c headphone adapters
deleted by creator
Your ears don’t understand digital signals, you can generally run (unbalanced!) audio over tens of metres without degrading audio quality (because impedance /= resistance) as judged with actually good headphones, and no in-ears have anywhere close to good sound, anyway.
With good muffs the deciding factor (ignoring source material) will be the quality of the DAC, not where it’s placed. And even the shittiest DACs nowadays are good enough to drive the best in-ears, simply due to in-ears having, physically, no choice but being shoddy.
deleted by creator
We already do have the same connector for all headphones. Well there’s also 6.35mm jacks but they’re practically the same connector in more shear resistant (it is terribly easy to shear off straight 3.5mm jacks by stumbling over the headphone cord. I recommend a straight plug to straight socket section as predetermined breaking point, and an angled connector on the appliance side).
Headphones neither receive digital signals nor DC power, those are the areas USB-C is actually for… and even within that category we should be careful: Imagine all monitors being USB-C, people nowadays can’t even manage to plug their monitor into the GPU instead of motherboard if every connector is USB-C, and they of course all won’t have the same feature set, they’ll plug it into the mouse our audio port.
What I definitely welcome is the death of the barrel jack, while the form factor is fine they never managed to standardise voltages and polarities. My cheap 10 buck kitchen scale I bought a week ago has a USB-C connector to charge the LIR2450 inside, that’s perfect: No fast charging no nothing it just takes straight 5V meaning it will happily charge off a PC from the 1990s, cheap to implement for the manufacturer and they don’t need to supply a wall plug.
deleted by creator
There is a universal headphone connector.
What’s next up for you universal connector? Power plugs? Garden hoses? Also as said everything having the same shape isn’t exactly always an advantage. How about a portable DAC? Do you always want me to triple-check which is the analogue output and which is the charge/data port?
deleted by creator
Going all-digital is better for sound quality.
This doesn’t make any sense. All sound signals must convert to analogue at some point. You simply cannot vibrate the air creating sound waves with a digital signal. Technically I suppose you could, but all you music would just sound like unintelligible beeping, and you’d still need some kind of amplifier to hear it anyway.
All we’ve done is move the DAC from the phone into the earbuds, or maybe a dongle. The latter may result in better audio if you have a high quality dongle, but the DAC in a pair of wireless earbuds will almost always sound worse simply due to size and power constraints.
And that doesn’t apply here. The feet are out wide for stability, keep weight down, cost, and leave room for a sound bar.
Hahahaha what do you mean? This has to be satire. Nobody is that dense right? If it doesn’t fit, don’t buy it lmao.
Is it that hard to read the post? OP is right, almost every TV on the market has the same cheap, shitty plastic feet, and they’re spaced as far apart as possible so you’re unnecessarily size-limited when trying to buy something like a bedroom TV to sit on top of bookshelves or a tallboy.
I’d like something more than 32" for my bedroom too, but I can find one new 40-42" TV on the market with a central stand now, and it is some obscenely expensive 4K OLED thing from Sony. I am keeping an eye out for older, pre-owned TVs as a result, but am yet to find any good deals.
They are that far apart to accommodate soundbars
I don’t know a single damn person buying a TCL who has sound bar money
Central stands are just not that safe on bigger screens. Sadly, the easy way is to place feet on each side of the screen. One could always go for a wall mount.
If you don’t like a product, don’t buy it and if you know that every product has this design, then it’s hardly a surprise when you unbox it at home.
This posts seems like OP didn’t check if the TV would fit before buying and now they’re angry at themselves.
Central stands made as shittily as the ones they put in the box, sure. A proper good central stand that uses the VESA mounts of a TV is a million times safer in my opinion
Almost like you get what you pay for. The manufacturer goes for the cheapest stand to make the entire TV cheaper.
If it had a good central stand it might be more expensive and then OP would buying a different cheaper TV with shitty stands.
Sketchy fast math says a 32" TV will be roughly 30" wide … Feet appear to be 3" in on each side which would put them at 24" on center… What kind of umpa lumpa ass table do you have? If that is your only option you can get a treated 8’ decking board for like $8, have Lowe’s cut it in half and throw it on top of the table to extend it.
That may not be an option if you’re renting, as many people are.
I don’t get this mentality. I’ve rented for over a decade and always wall mounted my TVs. It’s not tricky to unmount and fill in 6 or 8 holes with a bit of filler.
Do some renters really not hang pictures or put up shelves either? The effort to correct it is probably less work than it is to hang in the first place.
why are all of the 48" tv screens bigger than my 32" bedside table?
Damn, this is some next level entitled, petulant, energy.
If you’re gonna complain, at least try to do it constructively. As opposed to… Whatever this drivel is.
Same energy
The true reason is cost, those stands that are included nowadays are insanely cheap and flimsy. If you’re buying a large TV, you should budget $30-$50 for a VESA mount.
Yep, that’s what I figured happened when they went from proper swivel pedestals to those stupid wedges. Hell even computer monitors are joining in on the action, the number of brand new, fairly high end and expensive monitors whose stock base is just bolted to the back and have zero adjustments is ridiculous.
I got a VESA stand for my grandparents TV for 15 bucks. Solid steel and sturdy as fuck.
Yep, and the manufacturer can’t even be bothered to spend that much more money to include a high quality stand with a thousand dollar TV with already high profit margins. Somehow, having to throw the default OEM parts in a landfill because they’re intentionally low quality and barely usable and being forced to buy a passable replacement separately is just a thing that they expect us to do now. Capitalism innovates y’all!
Exactly. 15 bucks is my retail cost.
I bet mass producing those vesa feet to include in the box wouldnt even add 5 bucks to the total cost, and no one would care or notice the price, and would love the stronger, sturdier base that doesnt require the entire USS Nimitz just to set the damn thing down on.
You’d be first in line bitching that your TV fell over if they moved them in 6". Wall mounts are $18… buy one
I’m going to second this. I usually use wall mounts for my TVs and let me tell you, once it’s dialed in… Chefs kiss
The problem is getting the right mount with the right support for the TV you have. You can’t use a super cheap support for a super big TV, the adjustments won’t work correctly and it might fall off the wall.
Once you find one strong enough for your TV and determine how high/where you want it on the wall, the next task is simply finding something to mount to. My favorite method is to combine a few ways of securing the mount. I find the studs and put a solid wood project board over top of where I want the TV to mount, and screw the board into the studs. I then place the mount and trace out where it needs to be screwed in, I then go through the board, and the drywall/plaster with a drill and put in toggle bolts that sandwich from the mounting plate, through the backer board, into the drywall. It’s massive overkill to do it this way. Once that mounting plate is secured, it’s definitely not going anywhere with all of that extra support.
The basic concept I’m thinking of with this is that the backing board will spread out the load from the bracket being weighed down by the TV (the rotational/twisting force). This keeps the main pressure going straight down the wall.
Once the TV is hung and adjusted, it has no risk of being knocked over by your cat, it’s off of any surface, so you don’t need to sacrifice table space to support it, and in all likelihood, you won’t touch it again, apart from the occasional cleaning.
IMO, the only down side to mounting the TV to the wall is that you can’t easily plug a new device into it. It’s always a struggle to shove your face between the TV and the wall to try to see where the stupid connector is and plug it in.
Once the TV is hung and adjusted, it has no risk of being knocked over by your cat
My cat can jump to the middle of my mounted TV with a nice amount of force. I’m sure if she wanted to, she’d find a way to jump to the top and break it.
If your cat weighs enough to break your TV by jumping on top of it, it may be time to put that cat on a diet.
People really out here at stupid levels of angry now, eh?
This community is about mildly infuriating: The little stuff that triggers us.
And just like reddit lemmy up votes the crap out of the stupidity.
:(
At least you have a cat to hold it up
The cat’s for scale.